
Monument at 9535
Prints Scripps and Codex DNA. Not his operative report
File 02
Two operations are documented. The dates that led him to look are on the rail below. His claim of an unauthorized smart implant remains unproven. Staff denials stay in the file.

Monument at 9535
Prints Scripps and Codex DNA. Not his operative report

9535 Waples St
Street View pin. No Scripps or Codex letters on this crop

What they listed
Conventional Stryker / Biolox components
Right THA 9 Oct 2015. Left THA 23 Oct 2017. Both Scripps Green, Richard Walker MD. Staff later listed conventional Stryker / Biolox parts. No electronics on those lists.
Walker 17–19 Jun 2025: standard Stryker, no embedded chips. Greene: no biochips. Risk Management 27 May 2025 restates his Bluetooth concern and withholds the review under 1157. That is their paper. It is not a verdict of innocence.
Thin notes. 2015 era missing from the current EMR, with a staff explanation. 677 vs 675 on the same MTHFR timestamp. Sheean on 13 Oct 2016 labs vs Karches “I do not know a Dr. Sheean.” Iran labs sourced as “patient states.”
Implants as telemetry. A closed loop into a family ELISA catalog. That is his theory, labeled as such. Device stills are not on this page. His narrative is in The account.
Arrival · documented sequence
Independent reporting on this sequence is linked from the home page. Scanner identities and pairing detail are not published here.
Walker attending. Conventional Stryker / Biolox later listed. No electronics on those lists.
Result Trends includes 6 Sep 2016. The article’s same-morning courtroom collision is not the lab face. Keep both dates. Do not write the hook as established.
Test Details prints 677C>T. Result Trends prints c.675C>T. Assay footer names 677. Karches later writes she does not know Sheean.
Implant card and consent faces. Problem-list osteonecrosis date vs April MRI is a conflict.
The article quotes “loose parts.” That sentence is his account until a note prints it.
His measurements and photographs. Not a device identity.
Unrecognized Bluetooth on the phone, in his telling. Scanner stills and GATT tables stay off this page as methods.
Restates Bluetooth/vibration as his concern. Withholds the review under Evidence Code §1157.
Their words, on paper. Portal also prints retired / out until 29 Jan 2027. Both stay.