The Record

The Hooman Asbaghi Case

A filing is not a verdict. Nothing on this site is a finding of liability.

theasbaghirecord.com

The Record

About the Hooman Asbaghi Case

Hooman Asbaghi
Hooman Asbaghi

In March 2025 a San Diego inventor walked into the same court where, nine years earlier, a jury had returned one of California’s largest legal-malpractice verdicts of the year — and sued his mother and his sister.

Hooman Asbaghi holds multiple U.S. patents in safety-needle technology. In 2016 a San Diego Superior Court jury in Asbaghi v. Nydegger returned $61,587,000 against Nydegger & Associates on claims of legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty. TopVerdict ranked that figure No. 4 among California jury verdicts by dollar amount that year.

Open the file

He accuses his mother, Farideh Kavesh, of using a 1999 power of attorney to cut him out of Padtan Elm, a Tehran diagnostics company he says they co-founded. He accuses his sister, Ommid Asbaghi, of joining that exclusion and of running the hacking and malware on his devices.

Asbaghi vs Asbaghi — San Diego Superior Court 25CU01380C

Asbaghi vs Asbaghi

San Diego Superior Court · 25CU01380C · filed 17 March 2025

The file

Who is named, and what the documents show

A filing is not a verdict. Nothing on this site is a finding of liability.

This site is a record of Asbaghi vs Asbaghi and of the documents that bear on that caption. It starts with what he alleges. It then tests each allegation against what can be verified: a patent grant, a court docket, a company register, a published paper, a signed instrument. Where the file holds an original — a scan, a letterhead, a portal still — the page shows the face. Where the claim still has no document, the page says so.

  • His accountWhat he alleges. A claim in the complaint, or a statement he makes on this record. It is not a finding.
  • DocumentedVerified on the public record, or shown here as an original held in the file.
  • UnconfirmedClaimed, and still without a supporting record.

The five doors below are how the file is cut. Each one uses the same three marks.

Hooman Asbaghi

Hooman Asbaghi

01

Who is Hooman Asbaghi

The inventor

In the early 1990s he says he helped move coronary-stent technique into Tehran: Johnson & Johnson hardware with French cardiologist Bernard Valeix, and that he paved the way for a young Iranian cardiologist, Massoud Ghasemi, to train at Scripps Clinic. In California he built needlestick-prevention companies, licensed a design, then spent three years proving in court that the lawyers charged with keeping the patent alive had not. The verdict is the easiest fact in the book. It is why the rest of the file exists. A man who already won against his own counsel is not an anonymous complainant. The public record already took him seriously once.

Padtan Elm exhibition stand

Padtan Elm exhibition stand

02

What is Padtan Elm

The company

Four partners. Equal shares. Medical and laboratory goods. His mother, Farideh Kavesh, sat in the first board meeting as managing director with operating authority. The company made ELISA kits — thyroid, tumor markers, fertility, infectious disease — and later paper still calls it one of Iran’s first manufacturers of that platform. In 2018 and again in 2022 the attendance lists still print him at 250 shares. The signature column says by power of attorney. He is on the page. He is not in the chair. Earlier, a 2013 letter from inspector Kianosh Bohlouli describes a 14 January 2013 meeting held without him, a resolution to move assets to a new company, a mother who would not give the inspector the son’s number, a sister managing the related affairs, and the inspector’s removal.

Photograph provided for Who is Ommid Asbaghi

Photograph provided for Who is Ommid Asbaghi

04

Who is Ommid Asbaghi

The sister

A prominent San Diego philanthropist and a defendant in Asbaghi vs Asbaghi. In a California-notarized declaration, a former AT&T employee says he saw her in the Del Mar AT&T store with Hooman’s passwords, messages, photographs, and iCloud data on her phone — and that she did not want Hooman to know. A First Republic statement for a revocable trust in her name shows a $950,000 debit on 5 January 2017. The line names Hooman Asbaghi. The wire notice does not name a beneficiary. WhatsApp texts in this file have her telling a third party she has been watching his movements, friendships, and intentions. After the suit, texts in this file have her calling her brother a drug addict who has decided to screw up her mother’s life and hers.

6 September 2016 — the verdict listing and the 8:16 a.m. draw

6 September 2016 — the verdict listing and the 8:16 a.m. draw

05

Why a Smart Hip Implant

The medical record and the anomalies surrounding Scripps Clinic

On 6 September 2016, at 9:00 a.m., he says he stood in a San Diego courtroom awaiting the $61,587,000 verdict. Forty-four minutes earlier, at 8:16 a.m., his MyScripps portal recorded a blood draw for Testosterone, Bioavailable and Total, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, printed as collected that morning. He says he never requested that test, never authorized it, and was not there. He says he has not visited Scripps Clinic since 2020.

In 2025 he found a second collision. Scripps Clinic Med Labs from January 2023 listed an extensive metabolic workup in his name — hormones, thyroid, prostate, chemistry. Staff, quoting McGarvey, relayed that she had not seen him in five years. Karches writes she has not seen him since August 2017. On 27 May 2025, Scripps Medical Foundation Risk Management closed a review behind Evidence Code §1157 and would not release what it found. On 21 November 2025 the same office wrote that the Clinic had not seen him since 14 October 2020.

The letter says last seen 14 October 2020. The MyScripps app kept printing bloodwork after 2020. That contradiction is the investigation this door holds.