Documented · 5 Jan 2017
Outgoing, $950,000
First Republic Bank, “WIRE TRANSFER NOTICE / CONFIRMATION OF AUTHORIZED TRANSFER.” Notice date 01/05/17. Transaction amount $950,000.00. Fee $30.00. The form says this confirms an outgoing wire transfer.
Section 04g
The family loan
A First Republic Bank notice dated 5 January 2017 confirms an outgoing wire of $950,000 from an account in the name of Ommid S. Asbaghi, trustee of the Asbaghi Revocable Trust. This page is that face. Street and account last-four are on the face. The beneficiary is not.
1 · On the record
What the notice actually prints
Bank letterhead. A date. A trustee. An amount. The operational story — that this was a family loan being moved, returned, or hidden — is his label until a beneficiary line or a second page says so. The paper is stronger than the label.
Documented · the trustee
Ommid, on the Asbaghi Revocable Trust
Named: Ommid S Asbaghi, TTEE of the Asbaghi Revocable Trust, DTD 06/01/2011. Who is Ommid Asbaghi is the same person. This is that money window, not a second sister page.
Documented · no beneficiary
No beneficiary on this face
From-account is printed. A To: party is not. Filename says Returner. That word is not on the bank form. This still does not prove the money landed with him, with her, or offshore.
Context · why it sits here
Family paper, not a tax case
The company door is financial exclusion from Padtan Elm. This is a different piece of family money, on a U.S. bank notice, about fifteen months after the 9 October 2015 right replacement. He says a second $950,000 followed on 1 May 2017. No bank face for that second date is in the file. It does not prove the company claim and it does not disprove it. Street and last-four are on the face.
The statement for the same day prints a domestic-wire debit of $950,000. The line names Hooman Asbaghi. The notice above still does not name a beneficiary.
2 · The original
The hosted face
On the face: the street, the account number, the trustee, the trust, the date, the amount, the bank.