The Record

The Hooman Asbaghi Case

A filing is not a verdict. Nothing on this site is a finding of liability.

Section 14

Nargues Djavad / Narges Javad

Gazette faces print Narges Javad. His account and prior specs use Nargues Djavad. Both names on this door. Listing a name is not a finding of wrongdoing.

  • His accountWhat he alleges in court or on this site
  • DocumentedA public record, or an original in this file
  • UnconfirmedIn the file, not established

Return: What is Padtan Elm. The 2013 letter is on 14 January 2013. Alias /people/narges-javad opens this same room.

Documented: named as an equal shareholder by October 2002. Named managing director on later gazettes. IACLD Jorjani pages print her as CEO. Public directories list her as manager of PADTAN ELM CO. National ID 4723613680 as printed on gazette paper. The 1996 founding minutes still do not print her.

Recording he supplied · not a finding

The Behlouli–Narges call

Speakers as identified by the investigator: Kianoosh Behlouli and Narges Javad / Nargues Djavad. Call date is not printed on the file. Duration of the warehouse original is 2 minutes 16 seconds. The warehouse English “Report on the Content of the Voice Recording” is a circulated write-up. It is not this recording. This site does not autoplay the recording. Time marks only when the speaker changes. The recording is not mounted as an admission.

Both0:01

Hello — how are you? You’re well? Thank you. You’re well; health to you.

Behlouli0:07

Forgive me, Doctor. A summons / notice has come for me from this group of lawyers — I don’t know, Columbia — they sent it for me. I wasn’t there yesterday. It’s about the Padtan Elm company matters, from the time I was inspector: the meeting, I don’t know, year 92, when the shares were moved. They wanted to ask a series of questions — for example what did you do with this. In the end, did you yourselves get anywhere or not?

Narges0:48

I didn’t do anything, because the best explanations… well, because they are silent. Ms. Kavesh can give the best explanations. Who am I to explain to them?

Behlouli1:03

No, because I saw it had come in our [inbox / system]; they had given a deadline. I said I should answer, see in what form. Now I wanted to see whether you took any step, because I had something like this, but most of it is about the same Padtan Elm. Today was also the memorial for Dr. Ghasemi’s father. We had gone. I was there at that hour. Then they probably gave one to him too. You yourself said they had sent something for him too. Now they wanted me more as a witness. They said as witnesses. I said, well — the accounts inspector. We’ll gather the material for him. All right. I wanted to see if you did. Thank you. You’re welcome. At your service.

Unconfirmed: that she was a 1995 or 1996 equal founder on the constitution page. That she received the 2013 transfer. That “I didn’t do anything” on a phone call is a finding she was not involved. A 2024 official notice to Ghasemi and Narges Javad is later paper; its own footer says it is not a lawsuit.